Critical Thinking on Your Own
Arguments about regulating or not regulating various aspects of human behavior abound in society and in the psychology profession. Controversial issues include the causes of autism, use of hypnosis in therapy, validity of eyewitness testimony, and legalizing same-sex marriage, among many others. Thinking critically about the pros and cons of such issues is an important aspect of being a good citizen in our society, as well as of being a responsible professional psychologist. It is important to be a critical thinker when reviewing materials, as authors may use biased information to support their positions, whether intentionally or unintentionally. If a report focuses on limited aspects of the available data, even good research can be misleading.
For this Discussion, select one of the following controversial issues:
1. Cause of autism
2. Use of hypnosis in therapy
3. Validity of eyewitness testimony
4. Legalizing same-sex marriage
Search the Internet and find two news or other articles that defend different positions on the issue you chose. Be sure to include the URL for each article as a reference, using the appropriate APA format in the citation.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post by Day 4 a brief description of the controversial topic in psychology you selected and the different position articles you chose. Between the two articles, identify a minimum of three common errors and/or fallacies. Evaluate the impact of the errors/fallacies you selected on the psychology profession and on public perception, behavior, and/or attitudes. Explain how you would re-think, re-write, or address the errors/fallacies you selected.